Call for a consultation: 650-490-4545 888-592-7013

News & Resources

Litwin & Associates: Creative San Francisco Immigration Attorneys

News

Immigration

[11/19] Border Patrol says fence slows attacks on agents
[11/18] Wal-Mart truck used to smuggle immigrants
[11/14] Report: Illegal immigrant minors mistreated by US
[11/13] Report: Philadelphia area sees immigration growth
[11/10] Former IRA militant fights deportation in S. Texas

More...

Case Summaries

Immigration Law

[11/20] Kalilu v. Mukasey
Petition for review of BIA decision is dismissed in part, denied in part, and granted in part where: 1) there was no appellate jurisdiction to review petitioner's claim to asylum and request for voluntary departure; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of a motion for withholding of removal; 3) remand was required to allow application of new standards for determining whether an asylum application was frivolous, and for reconsideration of a motion to reopen.

[11/20] Abebe v. Mukasey
Petition for review of denial of relief under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act via a discretionary waiver of deportation is denied in part and dismissed in part by the court sitting en banc where: 1) there was a rational basis for section 212(c) being limited to discretionary relief from inadmissibility, but not from deportation; and 2) there was therefore no equal-protection violation in the denial of such relief.

[11/19] Sow v. Mukasey
Petition for review of denial of applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture is denied where: 1) substantial evidence supported the adverse credibility findings of the IJ; and 2) petitioner did not produce evidence that he was likely to face persecution upon his return to Mauritania.

[11/19] Budiono v. Mukasey
Petition for review of denial of application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture is denied where: 1) Board of Immigration Appeals can adopt part of the Immigration Judge's decision and add its own analysis; 2) substantial evidence supported the determination that the harms Christian, ethnic Chinese-petitioner suffered in Indonesia did not constitute persecution; and 3) substantial evidence supported the IJ's and BIA's determination that petitioner failed to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution in light of the fact that her family continues to live in relative safety in Indonesia.

[11/19] Diallo v. US Dept. of Justice
Petition for review of decision denying native citizen of Guinea asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), is granted where: 1) given the presence of errors in the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision as to issues that were properly exhausted and the plausibility of other newly claimed errors, remand to the BIA would not have been futile; and 2) there were sufficient exhausted flaws in the reasoning of the Immigration Judge's adverse credibility determination to warrant a remand, and the court could not confidently predict the same outcome if there were further agency reconsideration.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

The international immigration law firm of Litwin & Associates represents clients throughout the United States and California, Ca, Bay Area, Northern Ca, Southern California, San Francisco and San Francisco County, Marin County, San Rafael, Sausalito, San Anselmo, Ross, Mill Valley, San Mateo County including San Mateo, Millbrae, San Bruno, South San Francisco, Burlingame, Pacifica, Daly City, Brisbane, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough, Atherton, San Carlos, Belmont, Redwood City, Foster City, Redwood Shores, Sonoma County, Solano County, Napa County, Alameda County, Oakland, Berkeley, Hayward, Pleasanton, Livermore, Castro Valley, Fremont, Contra Costa County, Richmond, El Cerrito, Pinole, Martinez, Concord, Walnut Creek, Santa Clara County, Palo Alto, Mountain View, Mt. View, Silicon Valley, South Bay, San Jose, Campbell, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Sunnyvale, Gilroy, Monterey County, Santa Cruz, Salinas, Watsonville, Carmel. Beyond California, many clients come to us from surrounding states including Oregon, Washington, Nevada, and Arizona and beyond the borders of the United States.

  • Save to favorites
  • Print page
  • Email page to a friend

San Francisco Office

425 Market Street
Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 650-490-4545
Toll Free: 888-592-7013

650-588-4302 fax

Email | Map & Directions

Main Office

1435 Huntington Avenue
Suite 336
South San Francisco, CA 94080

Phone: 650-490-4545
Toll Free: 888-592-7013

650-588-4302 fax

Email | Map & Directions

Santa Clara Office

5201 Great America Parkway
Suite 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Phone: 650-490-4545
Toll Free: 888-592-7013

650-588-4302 fax

Email | Map & Directions


FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.